Systematic Evaluation of the Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) Content of Clinical Trial Protocols
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Systematic Evaluation of the Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) Content of Clinical Trial Protocols
BACKGROUND Qualitative evidence suggests patient-reported outcome (PRO) information is frequently absent from clinical trial protocols, potentially leading to inconsistent PRO data collection and risking bias. Direct evidence regarding PRO trial protocol content is lacking. The aim of this study was to systematically evaluate the PRO-specific content of UK National Institute for Health Research...
متن کاملSystematic evaluation of patient-reported outcome (PRO) protocol content and reporting in UK cancer clinical trials: the EPiC study protocol
INTRODUCTION Emerging evidence suggests that patient-reported outcome (PRO)-specific information may be omitted in trial protocols and that PRO results are poorly reported, limiting the use of PRO data to inform cancer care. This study aims to evaluate the standards of PRO-specific content in UK cancer trial protocols and their arising publications and to highlight examples of best-practice PRO...
متن کاملPatient-Reported Outcome (PRO) Assessment in Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review of Guidance for Trial Protocol Writers
BACKGROUND Evidence suggests there are inconsistencies in patient-reported outcome (PRO) assessment and reporting in clinical trials, which may limit the use of these data to inform patient care. For trials with a PRO endpoint, routine inclusion of key PRO information in the protocol may help improve trial conduct and the reporting and appraisal of PRO results; however, it is currently unclear ...
متن کاملthe washback effect of discretepoint vs. integrative tests on the retention of content in knowledge tests
در این پایان نامه تاثیر دو نوع تست جزیی نگر و کلی نگر بر به یادسپاری محتوا ارزیابی شده که نتایج نشان دهندهکارایی تستهای کلی نگر بیشتر از سایر آزمونها است
15 صفحه اولDemonstrating Methods for Handling Missing Patient Reported Outcome (Pro) Data in Clinical Trial Data Analysis.
PRM165 ExtERnal Validity of thE WEll-BEing RElatEd to food QuEstionnaiRE (WEll-BfQ©): VaRiations accoRding to thE suBjEcts’ nutRitional status Allaert FA1, Ginon E2, Rogeaux M3, Urdapilleta I4, Capuron L5, Dupuy A6, Layé S7, Lecerf J8, Prost M9, Guillemin I10, Marrel A10, Arnould B10 1CEN Biotech/CEN Nutriment, Dijon, France, 2Laboratory for Experimentation in Social Sciences and Behavioral Ana...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: PLoS ONE
سال: 2014
ISSN: 1932-6203
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0110229